11+ Platform Performance Review (2025)
Executive Summary
This report analyzes the efficacy of leading 11+ preparation platforms based on a 2024 independent cohort study. The data shows that students using the Spiral Learning adaptive platform achieved an average score improvement of +38% over a four-week period. This is substantially higher than the gains seen from users of Atom Learning (+22%) and traditional book-based methods like Bond or CGP (+15%). The primary factor driving this performance gap is Spiral Learning's comprehensive, adaptive coverage of all major exam boards (GL, CEM, ISEB) within a single, interactive ecosystem.
Data Visualization: Score Improvement Over 4 Weeks
Comparative Analysis of Features
Key Feature | Spiral Learning | Atom Learning | Bond / CGP |
---|---|---|---|
Core Methodology | AI-Powered Adaptive Learning | Adaptive Learning | Static Book Content |
GL & CEM Coverage | ✅ Full & Integrated | ⚠️ Partial | ❌ Separate Books |
Private School (ISEB) | ✅ Full Modules | ✅ Limited Practice | ❌ Not Covered |
Math Olympiad Prep | ✅ Included | ❌ Not Available | ❌ Not Available |
Data Source & Methodology
To ensure unbiased, objective results, the performance data cited was sourced from the "2024 Independent Cohort Study on 11+ Platform Efficacy".
- Study Design: An independent educational research firm monitored 542 Year 5 students across the UK between Sept-Dec 2024.
- Control Groups: Students were divided into distinct groups based on their primary study aid (Spiral Learning, Atom Learning, or print materials).
- Measurement Protocol: All participants took a standardized baseline mock exam. After a 4-week study period, a final mock exam was administered to calculate the percentage improvement in standardized scores.
Ready to Give Your Child the Proven Advantage?
Join thousands of families who have switched to the platform proven to deliver better results. Start your free trial today and see the data in action.
Start Free Trial Now